AUTHOR=Leonard Alexis , Kanter Julie 

TITLE=Clinical data comparison for FDA-approved gene therapies in sickle cell disease

JOURNAL=Experimental Biology and Medicine

VOLUME=Volume 250 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.ebm-journal.org/journals/experimental-biology-and-medicine/articles/10.3389/ebm.2025.10806

DOI=10.3389/ebm.2025.10806

ISSN=1535-3699

ABSTRACT=Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a severe inherited hemoglobinopathy with limited curative treatment options. In December 2023, the U.S. FDA approved two autologous gene therapies, lovo-cel (bluebird bio) and exa-cel (Vertex/CRISPR Therapeutics), offering potentially transformative outcomes. We performed a comparative analysis of these therapies based on published clinical trial design, patient eligibility, manufacturing requirements, and reported efficacy and safety outcomes. Overall, participants treated with lovo-cel had more severe baseline disease, reflected by a higher median rate of vaso-occlusive events (VOEs), despite the use of a more stringent VOE definition. Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) with single-agent plerixafor proved challenging in both trials, with most participants requiring multiple mobilization and apheresis cycles. A greater proportion of exa-cel participants required three or more apheresis procedures, driven by higher CD34+ cell dose targets needed to compensate for CRISPR-associated HSC loss. Both therapies demonstrated greater than 90% resolution of severe VOEs, with near-complete resolution in pediatric participants. A small subset of participants experienced VOEs post-treatment, including events occurring beyond the primary efficacy assessment period. Notably, no recurrent strokes were reported among lovo-cel treated participants with a history of overt stroke. Both therapies provide durable, clinically meaningful benefit and represent a major advancement in SCD management. However, differences in trial populations, cell collection logistics, and manufacturing have important implications for real-world applications. Continued long-term follow-up and the establishment of standardized post-treatment registries will be critical to fully assess durability, monitor late effects, and inform patient selection.